You don't get it, do you? Boxing is not the same as "brawling."
And you must understand that Brawling is not the same as Boxing. One, you only use your hands. The other, you can do whatever the heck you want. And that includes kicking people while they're down.
I asked you those questions because I wanted to know your reasoning for your rules and so far, your reasoning is based off of the concocted ruleset you've made up in your head about how Brawl should be played. I'm not saying that as a slam against you, I'm just saying that as an observation.
Personally, I don't like the rules, not because they take me out of my comfort zone, but because the rules limit strategies. If you had a tournament that had all items, a all Mushroom Kingdom tournament, a no MK tournament, even a team attack off tournament, I'd be down for it because strategies aren't limited. However, natural character strategies and moves are limited, exploitation of idiocy and punishable moves are limited, and therefore, red flags are raised.
I don't mind your rules if they actually have legit reasoning but I'm not seeing it. Help me see it because in any real fight, organized or not, I'm doing what works, as much as I want and as often as I want and I'm going to use my most powerful punches if the person is going to fall for them. Period.